Explicitly learned L2 rules can be automatized through systematic practice after a metalinguistic criterion is reached¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 1997 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Rules learned explicitly can be automatized: after subjects reached criterion on metalinguistic tests, systematic comprehension and production practice produced skill development in the taught rules. → Robert M. DeKeyser 1997
Evidence¶
Robert M. DeKeyser 1997¶
Robert M. DeKeyser. (1997). Beyond Explicit Rule Learning: Automatizing Second Language Morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Volume 19, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197002040
q3 · i? · causal · r?
Experimental study of automatization: 61 subjects first reached criterion on metalinguistic tests of grammar and vocabulary, then engaged in systematic, computer-controlled comprehension and production practice for 8 weeks, allowing explicit rules to be practiced toward automatization.
"After they hadreached criterion on a set of metalinguistic tests of grammar and vocabulary, they engaged insystematic, computer-controlled comprehension and production practice for 8 weeks."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Syntax — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Learning of second language morphosyntactic rules is highly skill-specific: comprehension practice yields comprehension skill and production practice yields production skill — related
- Automatized L2 morphosyntactic skills develop very gradually over time, following a power function learning curve like other cognitive skills — related
- A 1982 bilingual-education teacher-training packet asserts, citing Krashen, that repetitive drill and grammar-focused instruction are ineffective for second language acquisition — reports the opposite
- Explicit instruction facilitates the acquisition of L2 grammar — related
- Peer assessment skills are complex and not automatically acquired, so training and guidance are a crucial design variable — related
- Automatization of L2 skills requires extensive practice in a consistent environment, not repetition of grammar rules as in traditional exercises — related
- Learners acquired untaught syntactic properties but failed to show sensitivity to agreement they had been explicitly taught and practiced — reports the opposite
- No single rule was professed to be known by half the university students despite all having been taught the rules the previous winter — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
explicit-rules-automatizable-through-practice |
title |
Explicitly learned L2 rules can be automatized through systematic practice after a metalinguistic criterion is reached |
description |
Explicitly learned L2 rules can be automatized through systematic practice after a metalinguistic criterion is reached |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1997 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — robert-m-dekeyser-1997 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.