Explicit instruction facilitates the acquisition of L2 grammar¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 1997 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Results from computer-controlled posttests confirm that explicit instruction facilitates the acquisition of L2 grammar. → Rick de Graaff 1997
Evidence¶
Rick de Graaff 1997¶
Rick de Graaff. (1997). The Experanto Experiment: Effects of Explicit Instruction on Second Language Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197002064
q3 · i? · causal · r1
A controlled experiment in which two groups of 27 university students, differing in exposure to explicit instruction, followed a computer-controlled self-study course in an artificial language; posttest results "confirm the general hypothesis that explicit instruction facilitates the acquisition of L2grammar." No effect size is printed.
"Results from computer-controlledposttests confirm the general hypothesis that explicit instruction facilitates the acquisition of L2grammar."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Explicit L2 grammar instruction leads to larger learning effects than implicit instruction, as reported in the reviewed synthesis literature — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Corrective feedback facilitates L2 grammatical development, with explicit feedback stronger immediately and implicit feedback better maintained over time — related
- All four written CF types, including metalinguistic code CF, outperformed the control group on the delayed posttest of explicit L2 knowledge two weeks later. — related
- On the immediate posttest of explicit L2 knowledge, direct CF and metalinguistic CF with rule explanations outperformed the control group while metalinguistic code CF did not. — related
- Metalinguistic written CF was equivalent, not superior, to non-metalinguistic direct CF, contrasting with previous studies whose metalinguistic CF also contained correct forms. — related
- Explicitly learned L2 rules can be automatized through systematic practice after a metalinguistic criterion is reached — related
- Corrective feedback on second-language errors has a significant effect on L2 development that is maintained on delayed tests — related
- Form-focused instruction on noun endings significantly increases French immersion students' ability to correctly assign grammatical gender, with gains maintained on delayed posttests — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Explicit metalinguistic feedback outperforms recasts on the delayed oral imitation posttest measuring implicit knowledge — related
- Prompts were overall more effective than recasts as corrective feedback for L2 grammar learning — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
explicit-instruction-facilitates-l2-grammar-acquisition |
title |
Explicit instruction facilitates the acquisition of L2 grammar |
description |
Explicit instruction facilitates the acquisition of L2 grammar |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1997 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — rick-de-graaff-1997 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.