Claims

Students taught with the developed exposition-text learning material scored higher on a Bahasa Indonesia achievement post-test than students taught with the ordinary book

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental-class students achieved a higher average post-test 1 score (M=89.63±5.32) than control-class students (M=77.25±5.06) on the multiple-choice Bahasa Indonesia test. → Silaban et al. 2018

Evidence

Silaban et al. 2018

Wenny Silaban, Biner Ambarita & Usman Hadi. (2018). The Development and Implementation of Learning Material on Exposition Text to Improve Students' Achievement on Bahasa Indonesia. International Education Studies, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n11p53

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment at SMA 5 Medan with four purposively selected classes, 30 analysed students per class after removing high pre-test outliers. The article reports post-test 1 means of "M=89.63±5.32" for experimental and "M=77.25±5.06" for control classes; no test statistic or effect size is printed.

"The students in experimental class (M=89.63±5.32) are having higher score compared to the score in control class (M=77.25±5.06)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.