Claims

Expert lecturers and teachers rated the developed learning material as an excellent learning resource meeting BSNP criteria

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Thirteen respondents (6 lecturers, 7 teachers) gave positive comments on all material components, averaging M=3.76±0.42. → Silaban et al. 2018

Evidence

Silaban et al. 2018

Wenny Silaban, Biner Ambarita & Usman Hadi. (2018). The Development and Implementation of Learning Material on Exposition Text to Improve Students' Achievement on Bahasa Indonesia. International Education Studies, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n11p53

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Validation proceeded in three rounds: expert lecturer review, experienced high-school teacher review, and a small-student tryout, followed by standardization against BSNP criteria on content, depth, legibility, extension, design and language. The article reports the average respondent rating "M=3.76±0.42".

"All respondents gave positive comments to the material components, and is categorised to be excellent learning resources (M=3.76±0.42)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.