Claims

Teaching with FACTs produces significantly better inquiry-skill post-test results than teacher-centred teaching without FACTs in upper-secondary science

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1–r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? After five months of teaching with FACTs, the experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on the inquiry-skills post-test (p=.001). → Mária Ganajová 2021 q3 i? Within the experimental group, inquiry skills improved significantly from pre-test to post-test (paired t-test p=.004), while the control group showed no significant change (p=.613). → Mária Ganajová 2021 (2)

Evidence

Mária Ganajová 2021

Mária Ganajová, Ivana Sotáková, Stanislav Lukáč, Zuzana Ješková, Veronika Jurková, Renáta Orosová. (2021). Formative Assessment as a Tool to Enhance the Development of Inquiry Skills in Science Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol. 20, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.204

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test two-group study in three Slovak upper-secondary schools; experimental group n=73 taught with FACTs, control group n=48 taught without them, same teachers, content and duration. Post-test comparison was significant.

"However, the comparison of the post-test results showed a statistically significant difference between the experimental and the control group (p=.001, therefore p<α)."

Mária Ganajová 2021 (2)

Mária Ganajová, Ivana Sotáková, Stanislav Lukáč, Zuzana Ješková, Veronika Jurková, Renáta Orosová. (2021). Formative Assessment as a Tool to Enhance the Development of Inquiry Skills in Science Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol. 20, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.204

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Paired-sample t-test comparing pre-test and post-test within each group; experimental group mean difference .054 (p=.004), control group .011 (p=.613), confirming hypothesis H2.

"The paired t-test value in the experimental group (Pair E) was p=.004, therefore p<α. In the experimental group, a statistically significant difference in the inquiry skill development, was confirmed."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.