Teaching with FACTs produces significantly better inquiry-skill post-test results than teacher-centred teaching without FACTs in upper-secondary science¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1–r2·q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? After five months of teaching with FACTs, the experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on the inquiry-skills post-test (p=.001). → Mária Ganajová 2021
q3 i? Within the experimental group, inquiry skills improved significantly from pre-test to post-test (paired t-test p=.004), while the control group showed no significant change (p=.613). → Mária Ganajová 2021 (2)
Evidence¶
Mária Ganajová 2021¶
Mária Ganajová, Ivana Sotáková, Stanislav Lukáč, Zuzana Ješková, Veronika Jurková, Renáta Orosová. (2021). Formative Assessment as a Tool to Enhance the Development of Inquiry Skills in Science Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol. 20, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.204
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test two-group study in three Slovak upper-secondary schools; experimental group n=73 taught with FACTs, control group n=48 taught without them, same teachers, content and duration. Post-test comparison was significant.
"However, the comparison of the post-test results showed a statistically significant difference between the experimental and the control group (p=.001, therefore p<α)."
Mária Ganajová 2021 (2)¶
Mária Ganajová, Ivana Sotáková, Stanislav Lukáč, Zuzana Ješková, Veronika Jurková, Renáta Orosová. (2021). Formative Assessment as a Tool to Enhance the Development of Inquiry Skills in Science Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol. 20, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.204
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Paired-sample t-test comparing pre-test and post-test within each group; experimental group mean difference .054 (p=.004), control group .011 (p=.613), confirming hypothesis H2.
"The paired t-test value in the experimental group (Pair E) was p=.004, therefore p<α. In the experimental group, a statistically significant difference in the inquiry skill development, was confirmed."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Only the designing-experiments inquiry skill improved significantly, and its gain correlates with the highest frequency of FACT use — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Upper-secondary students show a low initial level of inquiry skills under prevalent teacher-centred teaching — related
- A teacher-led sourcing intervention increased upper secondary students' use of source features in search queries during online inquiry — related
- The inquiry-based instruction group scored significantly higher than the traditional-approach group on the post-test of scientific process skills — related
- Inquiry-based instruction significantly improved pre-service science teachers' scientific process skills from pretest to post-test in a university biology laboratory — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.