Claims

A ten-week Grade 3 multiplication facts intervention significantly increased the number of facts students attempted correctly on a fall Grade 4 inventory (d = 0.52)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Grade 3 students who received the supplementary facts intervention attempted and answered more inventory items correctly in fall Grade 4 than same-school comparison peers (d = 0.52). → Barbara Allen-Lyall 2018

Evidence

Barbara Allen-Lyall 2018

Barbara Allen-Lyall. (2018). Helping Students to Automatize Multiplication Facts: A Pilot Study. IEJEE, Volume 10, Issue 4, 391-396. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018438128

q3 · i2 · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental comparison of fall Grade 4 timed facts inventory scores between a no-treatment cohort (N=160) and a treatment cohort (N=133) taught by the same teachers. Independent-samples t-tests showed a significant difference in “attempted cor- rect” scores, with d= 0.52.

"There was a significant difference in the “attempted cor- rect” scores for no treatment (M= .90, SD= .12) and treat- ment (M= .95, SD= .06); t(250)= 4.53, p< .001, d= 0.52."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.