Claims

The intervention significantly increased correct answers out of all possible facts on the fall Grade 4 inventory (d = 0.86)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Treatment students answered a significantly greater proportion of all possible inventory facts correctly than comparison peers (d = 0.86). → Barbara Allen-Lyall 2018

Evidence

Barbara Allen-Lyall 2018

Barbara Allen-Lyall. (2018). Helping Students to Automatize Multiplication Facts: A Pilot Study. IEJEE, Volume 10, Issue 4, 391-396. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018438128

q3 · i3 · causal · r1

Independent-samples t-test on the same quasi-experimental comparison of the timed facts inventory: “correct out of all possible” scores were significantly higher for the treatment group (M= .66) than the no-treatment group (M= .47), d= 0.86.

"Additionally, there was a significant difference in the “correct out of all possible” scores for no treatment (M= .47, SD= .24) and treatment (M= .66, SD= .22); t(291)= 7.274, p< .001, d= 0.86."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.