Claims

STEM faculty implemented the five inquiry phases online during COVID-19 emergency remote teaching

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The article adds practical examples of faculty implementing the five inquiry phases online as part of COVID-19 emergency remote teaching. → West 2021

Evidence

West 2021

West, R.E., Sansom, R., Nielson, J., Wright, G., Turley, R.S., Jensen, J., & Johnson, M. (2021). Ideas for supporting student-centered stem learning through remote labs: a response. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09905-y

q1 · i? · design · r1

This is the response article's own contribution, described in its abstract: the authors add practical examples of faculty implementing the inquiry phases online during COVID-19 emergency remote teaching. The abstract offers no data, effect sizes, or detailed methods for this contribution.

"add additional practical examples of faculty implementing these phases online as part of COVID-19 emergency remote teaching"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id faculty-implemented-inquiry-phases-online-covid
title STEM faculty implemented the five inquiry phases online during COVID-19 emergency remote teaching
description STEM faculty implemented the five inquiry phases online during COVID-19 emergency remote teaching
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — west-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.