Faculty advisors and mentors are considered pivotal in promoting doctoral students' development as responsible and ethical researchers¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q1
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Faculty who serve as mentors and advisors are regarded as being in a pivotal position to promote young scientists' responsible and ethical research skills. → Janice Ballou 2009
Evidence¶
Janice Ballou 2009¶
Janice Ballou, Brian Roff. (2009). Training Ph.D.s: The Views of Faculty on Their Role and Their Institutions' Role in Promoting the Development of Responsible Researchers. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/training-phds-the-views-of-faculty-on-their-role-and-their-institutions-role-in-promoting-the-development-of-responsible-researchers
q1 · i? · associational · r?
The report's introductory rationale asserts, without presenting data on this page, that "Faculty who serve as mentors and advisors are in a pivotal position" for developing responsible researchers. This is the study's motivating premise, not a tested result.
"Faculty who serve as mentors and advisors are in a pivotal position to promote the development of young scientists’ research skills in a responsible and ethical manner."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Before this study, no focused studies demonstrated what faculty mentors and advisors do to promote research integrity — related
- Mentoring relationships in undergraduate research are highly influential in students' campus connection, retention in their major, and persistence to graduation — related
- Effective leadership plays a pivotal role in guiding digital transformation in educational organizations — related
- Faculty concerns centered on academic integrity (80%) and student over-reliance on AI (70%), and their most requested development topic was AI ethics and academic integrity (70%) — related
- The most reported risks of AI tools in science and chemistry education are ethical issues, including gender and racial bias, hallucinations, copyright infringement, and plagiarism — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
faculty-mentors-pivotal-responsible-research-development |
title |
Faculty advisors and mentors are considered pivotal in promoting doctoral students' development as responsible and ethical researchers |
description |
Faculty advisors and mentors are considered pivotal in promoting doctoral students' development as responsible and ethical researchers |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2009 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — janice-ballou-2009 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.