Claims

Fadeout of early mathematics intervention effects: treatment effects fade but remain significant at kindergarten follow-up

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In the full sample, treatment children outperformed control children at post-test (p < .001), and the effect faded but remained statistically significant at follow-up (p < .05). → Bailey 2015

Evidence

Bailey 2015

Bailey, D. H., Nguyen, T., Jenkins, J. M., Domina, T., Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Wolfe, C. B., & Spitler, M. E. (2015). Fadeout in an Early Mathematics Intervention: Same Old Schools or Underlying Skills? SREE Spring 2015 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED562173

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Analysis of the TRIAD evaluation of the Building Blocks curriculum in 42 low-resource schools, with 361 control and 418 treatment children assessed with the REMA at post-test and kindergarten follow-up. The article reports the treatment effect "faded out but remained statistically significant at the follow-up assessment (p < .05)".

"In the full sample, children in the treatment group outperformed children in the control group at the post-test assessment (p < .001). This effect faded out but remained statistically significant at the follow-up assessment (p < .05; Figure 2)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.