Gains from the one-year intervention fade in kindergarten while gains from the two-year intervention are sustained¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Gains made during the 1-year intervention began to fade in kindergarten, whereas gains made during the 2-year intervention were sustained in kindergarten. → Starkey et al. 2013
Evidence¶
Starkey et al. 2013¶
Prentice Starkey, Alice Klein, & Lydia DeFlorio. (2013). Changing the Developmental Trajectory in Early Math Through a Two-Year Preschool Math Intervention. SREE Fall 2013 Conference Abstract. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED563068
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Longitudinal follow-up into kindergarten of the cluster-randomized preschool math intervention conditions; the authors' conclusion section states the differential persistence of gains by intervention duration.
"Gains children made during the 1-year intervention began to fade in K, but gains children made during the 2-year intervention were sustained in K."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The amount of language growth children made during the preschool intervention year did not predict kindergarten outcomes and did not alter the moderated treatment effects — related
- Fadeout of early mathematics intervention effects: treatment effects fade but remain significant at kindergarten follow-up — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.