Among low baseline self-efficacy students, favorability toward a format moderated its benefit: tutor favorability favored tutor gains, paper unfavorability favored paper gains¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Low baseline self-efficacy students more favorable toward computer-based practice benefited more from the tutor, while those less favorable toward paper-based practice benefited more from paper instruction. → Xinfei Cen 2026
Evidence¶
Xinfei Cen 2026¶
Xinfei Cen, Vincent Aleven, Kenneth R. Koedinger, Conrad Borchers, and Paulo F. Carvalho. (2026). Self-Efficacy and Favorability Shape Learning from Tutoring Systems and Paper Practice. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17470 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.17470
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Figure 3 visualizes the significant three-way interaction, splitting favorability into low, medium, and high levels (mean ± SD). The quoted contrast is the paper-panel pattern; the tutor panel showed the mirrored pattern for computer-based favorability. No effect size printed.
"Specifically, low baseline self-efficacy students who were less favor-able toward paper-based practice benefited more from paper-based instruction, compared to low baseline self-efficacy students who were more favorable toward paper-based practice."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Motivation — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it
Related Claims¶
- The effect of practice condition on learning gains was moderated by a three-way interaction of condition, baseline self-efficacy, and favorability — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Students with lower baseline self-efficacy achieved greater learning gains in both practice formats, though the relationship varied with favorability toward each format — related
- Favorability scores were not associated with posttest scores, suggesting they reflect general attitudes toward the practice method — related
- Tutor-based practice produced greater learning gains than paper-based practice on matched problem sets — related
- Each form of accountability can produce favorable or unfavorable effects — related
- Formative assessment shows gains in student self-efficacy and motivation and particular benefits for disadvantaged and low-achieving students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
favorability-moderates-format-benefit-low-self-efficacy |
title |
Among low baseline self-efficacy students, favorability toward a format moderated its benefit: tutor favorability favored tutor gains, paper unfavorability favored paper gains |
description |
Among low baseline self-efficacy students, favorability toward a format moderated its benefit: tutor favorability favored tutor gains, paper unfavorability favored paper gains |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — xinfei-cen-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.