Claims

Most experimental students held favorable attitudes toward the consciousness-raising task instruction, including many who overall disliked the method

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 59.6% of the experimental group expressed positive attitudes toward the grammar instruction versus 40.4% negative. → Đặng 2012 q2 i? About 65% of learners in the 'negative' group still agreed the tasks improved active work, attention, memory, and pair/group interaction. → Đặng 2012 (2)

Evidence

Đặng 2012

Đặng, T. T. Đ., & Nguyễn, H. T. (2012). Direct versus Indirect Explicit Methods of Enhancing EFL Students' English Grammatical Competence: A Concept Checking-based Consciousness-raising Tasks Model. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p112

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Simple frequencies and percentages of questionnaire responses from the 47 experimental learners; approach-preference mean was M=2.82 and favorable reasons (M=4.1) exceeded unfavorable reasons (M=2.7). Descriptive statistics only; no inferential test is printed.

"The fact that most learners in the experimental group (59.6%; n=47) had positive attitudes towards the grammar instruction, compared with those who have negative ideas (40.4%; n=47) towards the method"

Đặng 2012 (2)

Đặng, T. T. Đ., & Nguyễn, H. T. (2012). Direct versus Indirect Explicit Methods of Enhancing EFL Students' English Grammatical Competence: A Concept Checking-based Consciousness-raising Tasks Model. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p112

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Questionnaire frequency analysis of the subgroup of experimental learners who disliked the method; the article reports roughly 65 percent agreement on task benefits. Descriptive only.

"Around 65 percent of the learners in the ‘negative' group did agree that the tasks improved their active work, attention, and memory of the targeted structures and interaction in pairs work and group work."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.