Claims

Flexible bronchoscopy simulation-based training improves novice trainees' skills when evaluated in a simulation setting

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Eleven of 14 included studies reported significant improvements in more than one-half of their outcome measures after FB SBT. → Gerretsen Eveline C.F. MSc 2023

Evidence

Gerretsen Eveline C.F. MSc 2023

Gerretsen Eveline C.F. MSc, Chen Aoben MD, Annema Jouke T. MD, PhD, Groenier Marleen PhD, van der Heijden Erik H.F.M. MD, PhD, van Mook Walther N.K.A. MD, PhD, Smeenk Frank W.J.M. MD, PhD. (2023). Effectiveness of Flexible Bronchoscopy Simulation-Based Training: A Systematic Review. Chest. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2023.05.012

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Systematic review of 14 studies of FB SBT for novice trainees (pretest-posttest, two-group nonrandomized, and randomized designs). The review reports that "Eleven studies reported significant improvements in more than one-half of their outcome measures," with heterogeneous outcome measures; no pooled effect size was computed.

"Eleven studies reported significant improvements in more than one-half of their outcome measures. Outcome measures were heterogeneous, ranging from simulator metrics (eg, percentage of time in midlumen) to (validated) bronchoscopy assessment tool end scores."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.