Claims

Simulation-based training significantly improves surgical trainees' time to completion, technical errors, skills scores and theoretical knowledge in heart valve surgery

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Studies that evaluated outcomes showed significant improvement in time to completion of tasks, proportion of trainees committing technical errors, skills scores and theoretical knowledge after participation in SBT. → EL-Andari R 2023

Evidence

EL-Andari R 2023

EL-Andari R, Bozso SJ, Kang JJH, Fialka NM, Adams C, Nagendran J. (2023). Teaching heart valve surgery techniques using simulators: a systematic review. Canadian Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.017921

q3 · i? · review · r2

Systematic review (PRISMA) of PubMed and Embase to May 2022; 1322 articles screened, 67 full texts reviewed, 10 included. The review reports that "Significant improvement in surgical trainees' time to completion of tasks, number of mistakes, skills scores and theoretical knowledge" was found across the included studies.

"Significant improvement in surgical trainees' time to completion of tasks, number of mistakes, skills scores and theoretical knowledge after participation in SBT has been reported.5,11,12,26–28,30,35–37"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.