Claims

Flipped classroom improves cooperation and communication skills (pooled RR 1.60)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? FC students showed significantly higher cooperative communication ability than LBL students, with a pooled RR of 1.60 (95% CI 1.28–2.01) under a random-effects model; no standardized effect size was printed. → Zheng Hui 2026

Evidence

Zheng Hui 2026

Zheng Hui, Ouyang Yun, Zeng Yifei, He Xinyu, Song Liping, Yu Xiangyuan. (2026). Systematic evaluation of the teaching effectiveness of flipped classroom mode in undergraduate preventive medicine courses in China. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1896815

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of 8 studies comparing collaborative communication skills; substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 70.5%, p = 0.001) led to a random-effects model. Begg’s test found no significant publication bias (P = 0.063). The article prints no standardized effect size for this finding.

"the cooperative communication ability of students in the FC group was significantly higher than that in the LBL group, with a pooled RR of 1.60 (95% CI: 1.28–2.01)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.