Claims

Flipped classroom improves teacher-student interaction (pooled RR 1.35), based on few studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Teacher-student interaction was significantly higher in the FC group than in the LBL group, with an RR of 1.35 (95% CI 1.10–1.66), pooled from only three studies with negligible heterogeneity; no standardized effect size was printed. → Zheng Hui 2026

Evidence

Zheng Hui 2026

Zheng Hui, Ouyang Yun, Zeng Yifei, He Xinyu, Song Liping, Yu Xiangyuan. (2026). Systematic evaluation of the teaching effectiveness of flipped classroom mode in undergraduate preventive medicine courses in China. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1896815

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Fixed-effects meta-analysis of 3 studies comparing teacher-student interaction; heterogeneity was negligible (I2 < 0.1%, p = 0.952). The article itself notes "the limited number of studies" underlying this estimate and prints no standardized effect size.

"teacher-student interaction in the FC group was significantly higher than that in the LBL group, with an RR of 1.35 (95% CI: 1.10–1.66). Due to the limited number of studies, the figure is not presented."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.