Claims

Iraqi EFL learners reported infrastructure, technology, and social barriers to flipped classroom implementation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Interviewees named slow internet connection (N=7), video quality (N=6), unawareness of using technology (N=4), and social factors (N=3) as drawbacks of FCI. → Ramyar O. Qader and Fadime Yalcin Arslan 2019

Evidence

Ramyar O. Qader and Fadime Yalcin Arslan 2019

Ramyar O. Qader and Fadime Yalcin Arslan. (2019). THE EFFECT OF FLIPPED CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION IN WRITING: A CASE STUDY WITH IRAQI EFL LEARNERS. Teaching English with Technology, 19(1), 36-55. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1204642

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Inductive content analysis of the 10 interviews identified drawback themes: slow internet connection (N=7), quality of videos (N=6), unawareness of using technology (N=4), and social factors such as parental restrictions on internet use (N=3). One student noted "Internet connection in Iraq is very slow".

"some students commented that slow interne t connection was a problem (N=7) as one student explained it in the following way"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.