Flipped classroom instruction produced significantly better post-test writing scores than traditional instruction among Iraqi EFL sophomores¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1–r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? After an eight-week FCI program, the experimental group's post-test writing mean (6.17) was significantly higher than the control group's (5.31), t=2.013, P=0.048. → Ramyar O. Qader and Fadime Yalcin Arslan 2019 q2 i? The experimental group's mean rose from 4.35 to 6.17 while the control group's rose only slightly from 4.64 to 5.31. → Ramyar O. Qader and Fadime Yalcin Arslan 2019 (2)

Evidence¶

Ramyar O. Qader and Fadime Yalcin Arslan 2019¶

Ramyar O. Qader and Fadime Yalcin Arslan. (2019). THE EFFECT OF FLIPPED CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION IN WRITING: A CASE STUDY WITH IRAQI EFL LEARNERS. Teaching English with Technology, 19(1), 36-55. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1204642

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group study of 66 Iraqi sophomore EFL students; independent-sample t-test on post-test writing scores showed a significant difference between the flipped (x =6.17, N=34) and traditional (x =5.31, N=32) groups, with the printed result "(T=2.013, P=0.048)". No effect size is reported.

"an independent-sample t-test revealed that at the end of the FCI program there was a significant difference betw een the mean scores of the experimental group ( x =6.17, N=34, SD=1.72) and the control group ( x =5.31, N=32, SD=1.76)"

Ramyar O. Qader and Fadime Yalcin Arslan 2019 (2)¶

Ramyar O. Qader and Fadime Yalcin Arslan. (2019). THE EFFECT OF FLIPPED CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION IN WRITING: A CASE STUDY WITH IRAQI EFL LEARNERS. Teaching English with Technology, 19(1), 36-55. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1204642

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive statistics (Table 2) for the same quasi-experiment show the experimental group's mean increased from 4.35 to 6.17 while the control group "only sligh tly increased" from 4.64 to 5.31; these are descriptive means with no test statistic attached to the gains.

"students in the experimental group had a mean average that increased from ( x =4.35, N=34, SD=1.85 to x =6.17, N=34, SD=1.72), whereas the mean average of students in the control group only sligh tly increased from ( x =4.64, N=32, SD=1.72 to x =5.31, N=32, SD=1.76)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Iraqi EFL learners held predominantly positive attitudes toward flipped classroom instruction — related
• Before the FCI treatment, the experimental and control groups showed no statistically significant difference in writing ability — related
• Iraqi EFL learners reported infrastructure, technology, and social barriers to flipped classroom implementation — related
• Integrating YouTube videos into EFL instruction produced significantly higher post-test content learning than lecture-based instruction — related
• AI-mediated language instruction produces significantly greater English learning achievement gains than traditional instruction among EFL learners — related
• Structured AI-supported writing instruction produced a large posttest writing proficiency advantage over traditional instruction in Saudi EFL undergraduates — related
• Class IX physical science students taught with the constructivist 7E model achieved significantly higher post-test and gain scores than students taught with traditional methods — related
• Secondary students taught in an e-classroom with ICT resources significantly outperform students taught by conventional methods on post-test achievement — related