Feedback provision dipped in weeks three and six across all groups, possibly because the skills taught those weeks had fewer components¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? All three groups showed a decrease in feedback during weeks three and six of the eight-week sequence. → Andrews 2011

Evidence¶

Andrews 2011¶

Andrews, A., Bobo, L., & Spurlock, A. (2011). Use of video feedback in the training of pre-service teachers. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies. (no URL printed in the article text). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1056349

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive observation from the eight-week teaching episodes reported in Results; the Discussion attributes the dip to "the limited number of components for skills taught during week three and six" and suggests making each week's episode increase in difficulty.

"Weeks three and six, among the groups showed a decrease in providing feedback."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Integrating spelling games with visualisation strategies can re-motivate students when performance dips mid-intervention. — related
• Pre-service clinical teachers who viewed videotapes of their teaching with guided feedback provided more total feedback to students than teachers in a seminar-only group and a control group across eight teaching episodes — related