Pre-service clinical teachers who viewed videotapes of their teaching with guided feedback provided more total feedback to students than teachers in a seminar-only group and a control group across eight teaching episodes¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1–r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Group One (seminar and video) scored significantly higher on total feedback than Groups Two and Three, with significant ANOVA results for total feedback and every weekly teaching episode. → Andrews 2011 q2 i? Pairwise comparisons showed Group One differed from both Group Two and Group Three on total feedback and all eight episodes, with larger mean differences versus the control group. → Andrews 2011 (2)

Evidence¶

Andrews 2011¶

Andrews, A., Bobo, L., & Spurlock, A. (2011). Use of video feedback in the training of pre-service teachers. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies. (no URL printed in the article text). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1056349

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Randomized three-group experiment with 30 pre-service athletic training teachers videotaped over eight weekly 20-minute clinical teaching episodes; one-way ANOVAs with Tukey HSD compared groups on total feedback. The article reports a statistically significant group difference in total feedback score (F = 28.046, p < .001) and for each episode, e.g. "first ( F = 4.644, p < .05)".

"When comparing differences among the groups, statistically significant results were noted in total feedback score ( F = 28.046, p < .001), and total feedback for each episode including first ( F = 4.644, p < .05)"

Andrews 2011 (2)¶

Andrews, A., Bobo, L., & Spurlock, A. (2011). Use of video feedback in the training of pre-service teachers. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies. (no URL printed in the article text). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1056349

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Pairwise Tukey comparisons among the three randomized groups in the same eight-week experiment, reported in Results and Table 3 with mean differences (e.g. total feedback One and Three 92.60, p < .001). The article notes "Group One to Group Two had lower mean differences than Group One did to Group Three".

"Examining pairwise differences among the groups for total feedback time found that Group One to Group Two had lower mean differences than Group One did to Group Three for every teaching episode except for episode four."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A focused effective-teaching seminar alone did not improve feedback frequency: the seminar-only and control groups provided similar amounts of feedback — related
• Group differences in total feedback time per teaching episode were large, with partial eta-squared ranging from .256 to .707 across the eight weeks — related
• Male pre-service teachers provided more total feedback than females in this study, contrary to previous research — related
• Feedback provision dipped in weeks three and six across all groups, possibly because the skills taught those weeks had fewer components — related