Claims

Only 14% of the reviewed grief-training articles provided a theoretical framework or empirical definition of grief, and all focused on bereavement grief

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Only 14% of articles (n = 6) provided a theoretical framework or empirical definition of grief; where described, grief was a non-linear process experienced in waves, and the focus of all articles was bereavement grief. → Sikstrom L 2019

Evidence

Sikstrom L 2019

Sikstrom L, Saikaly R, Ferguson G, Mosher PJ, Bonato S, Soklaridis S. (2019). Being there: A scoping review of grief support training in medical education. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224325

q2 · i? · review · r2

Descriptive synthesis of the included literature. The review reports "only 14% of articles (n = 6) provided a theoretical framework or empirical definition of grief" and characterizes grief as a non-linear process experienced in waves.

"Our scoping review found that only 14% of articles (n = 6) provided a theoretical framework or empirical definition of grief [33]. Grief was described as a non-linear process that is experienced in “waves,” rather than a slow incremental improvement in symptoms [33–35]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.