Claims

Implementing grief training faces multi-level challenges including small class sizes, faculty turnover and low motivation because some physicians do not consider grief support part of their job

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Logistical, institutional and motivational challenges impeded grief training: class sizes small enough for quality training, sustainability after staff turnover without a faculty champion, competing curriculum needs, and physicians not considering grief support part of their job description. → Sikstrom L 2019

Evidence

Sikstrom L 2019

Sikstrom L, Saikaly R, Ferguson G, Mosher PJ, Bonato S, Soklaridis S. (2019). Being there: A scoping review of grief support training in medical education. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224325

q2 · i? · review · r2

Thematic synthesis of challenges reported across the included studies. The review reports that "some physicians do not consider it part of their job description", alongside logistical challenges of small class sizes and training not sustained after staff turnover without a faculty lead.

"It was noted that the motivation to introduce grief training may be low, as some physicians do not consider it part of their job description [45,52]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.