Only 3 of 22 reviewed studies examine technology-blended delivery of WIL, and 4 examine fully technology-based WIL¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Only three reviewed studies examine how technologies can be employed to deliver, as opposed to support, WIL, and four studies provide examples where the entire WIL experience is technologically-based. → Schuster 2017

Evidence¶

Schuster 2017¶

Schuster, Lisa & Glavas, Charmaine (2017). Exploring the dimensions of electronic work integrated learning (eWIL). Educational Research Review, 21, pp. 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.04.001

q2 · i? · review · r2

Results of the systematic literature review of 22 publications: the technology-blended category contains three studies (e.g., Fong and Sims 2010; Holmes 2011) in which technology is instrumental to achieving WIL tasks or learning outcomes.

"Only a few studies (3) included in this review (see Table 1, “technology-blended”) examine how technologies can be employed to deliver, as opposed to support, WIL."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Key challenges for eWIL include securing partner organizations, lack of support systems, software quality, staff training and equity of access — related
• Technology can remove geographical barriers and allow rural and external students to engage in WIL activities — related
• Most eWIL research (15 of 22 reviewed studies) examines technology used backstage to support WIL processes rather than to deliver WIL — related
• Technologies are used to assess student performance during WIL, commonly via online reflective journals and e-portfolios — related