Claims

The Fisher Fellowship selection instrument is reliable, though three of 34 items had relatively low levels of one type of reliability

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2025: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The instrument KIPP uses to identify candidates for the Fisher Fellowship program is reliable; however, three of the 34 items had relatively low levels of one type of reliability. → Elias Walsh 2022

Evidence

Elias Walsh 2022

Elias Walsh, Alicia Demers, Jeffrey Terziev, Erin Boyle, Elisa Steele, Ijun Lai. (2022). Findings from an Evaluation of KIPP School Leadership Programs. Mathematica. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/findings-from-an-evaluation-of-kipp-school-leadership-programs

q2 · i? · associational · r?

Psychometric examination of the properties of the Fisher Fellowship candidate selection instrument, including its reliability. The instrument was found reliable, with "three of the 34 items" showing relatively low levels of one type of reliability; no coefficients are printed in the summary.

"The instrument KIPP uses to identify candidates for the Fisher Fellowship program is reliable. However, three of the 34 items had relatively low levels of one type of reliability."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id fisher-fellowship-selection-instrument-reliable
title The Fisher Fellowship selection instrument is reliable, though three of 34 items had relatively low levels of one type of reliability
description The Fisher Fellowship selection instrument is reliable, though three of 34 items had relatively low levels of one type of reliability
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
recheck_by 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — elias-walsh-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.