Claims

Average impacts of KIPP middle schools were positive and statistically significant throughout the 10-year study period, though higher in earlier years than recent years

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 causal r? · q2–q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Middle school impacts remained positive and statistically significant across the 10-year period covered by the study, but declined in magnitude in recent years relative to earlier years. → Christina Clark Tuttle 2015

q3 i? Average impacts of KIPP middle schools remained positive and statistically significant across the 10-year period covered by the study, but were higher in earlier years than in recent years. → Tuttle 2015

Evidence

Christina Clark Tuttle 2015

Christina Clark Tuttle, Philip Gleason, Virginia Knechtel, Ira Nichols-Barrer, Kevin Booker, Gregory Chojnacki, Thomas Coen, Lisbeth Goble. (2015). Understanding the Effect of KIPP as it Scales: Volume I, Impacts on Achievement and Other Outcomes (Executive Summary). Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/executive-summary-understanding-the-effect-of-kipp-as-it-scales-volume-i-impacts-on-achievement

q2 · i? · causal · r?

The key findings report that average middle school impacts were "positive and statistically significant throughout the 10-year period covered by the study," with a printed pattern of higher impacts in earlier years than recent years. No effect sizes are printed.

"Average impacts of middle schools were positive and statistically significant throughout the 10-year period covered by the study, though higher in earlier years than recent years."

Tuttle 2015

Tuttle, C. C., Gleason, P., Knechtel, V., Nichols-Barrer, I., Booker, K., Chojnacki, G., Coen, T., & Goble, L. (2015). Going to Scale: As KIPP Network Grows, Positive Impacts Are Sustained (In Focus Brief). Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/going-to-scale-as-kipp-network-grows-positive-impacts-are-sustained

q3 · i? · causal · r?

The Key Findings section reports a temporal pattern in middle school impacts over the study's 10-year period: sustained positive, statistically significant average impacts, with the printed observation that impacts were "higher in earlier years than recent years." No effect sizes are printed.

"Average impacts of middle schools were positive and statistically significant throughout the 10-year period covered by the study, though higher in earlier years than recent years."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id kipp-middle-impacts-positive-throughout-higher-earlier-years
aliases kipp-middle-impacts-higher-earlier-years
title Average impacts of KIPP middle schools were positive and statistically significant throughout the 10-year study period, though higher in earlier years than recent years
description Average impacts of KIPP middle schools were positive and statistically significant throughout the 10-year study period, though higher in earlier years than recent years
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2015
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — christina-clark-tuttle-2015, tuttle-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.