Most attributes and practices of the five-factor mentoring model (30 of 34) provided input into a first-practicum mentee's classroom management, with no overt evidence on aims, curriculum, timetabling or assessment¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer3·q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In one first-practicum case, 30 of the 34 attributes and practices of the five-factor mentoring model provided input into the mentee's classroom management development. → Sempowicz 2011
q2 i? No overt evidence was found on mentoring aims, curriculum, timetabling or assessment facilitating the mentee's behaviour management development in this first practicum. → Sempowicz 2011
Evidence¶
Sempowicz 2011¶
Sempowicz, T., & Hudson, P. (2011). Analysing mentoring dialogues for developing a preservice teacher's classroom management practices. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(8). https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol36/iss8/1 doi:10.14221/ajte.2011v36n8.4
q2 · i? · qualitative · r3
Qualitative single case study of one mentor-mentee dyad over a four-week first practicum, using multiple sources (dialogue recordings, lesson plans, reflections, reports, interviews) coded against the five-factor model. The article reports "30 of the 34 attributes and practices" were evidenced, with aims, curriculum, assessment and timetabling absent.
"This case study collated and analysed data on 30 of the 34 attributes and practices associated with the five factor mentoring model. Little or no data were collected specifically on the development of aims and curriculum, formal assessment, or timetabling (scheduling) in this first practicum period."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Talk-time analysis showed the mentor spoke more than the mentee in video-recorded dialogues, with classroom management talk ranging from 3% to 39% of total talk time — related
- Repeating one short lesson six times with small groups gave the mentee repeated opportunities to review and modify her classroom management strategies and build confidence — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Mentor modelling and a school-wide behaviour program's strategies transferred to the mentee's classroom management practices — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- A structured feedback-and-reflection cycle (pre-lesson plan review, immediate verbal comments, written feedback, take-up time, and open-ended questioning) supported the mentee's reflective development — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Mentee participation in a school-wide positive behaviour support program (Program Achieve) enabled confident implementation of learned strategies in other lessons — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Classrooms where mentors understand and model program concepts are more fruitful contexts for student teachers' learning — a broader claim this one bears on
- Literacy coaching responsibilities fall into two major areas: teacher mentoring and literacy program advocacy — related
- In the Ethiopian TDT study, novice teachers performed as well as facilitators in designing communicative English lessons — related
- Findings suggest VR-mediated mentoring with 360VR supports newly qualified teachers' noticing, classroom management competencies and self-efficacy — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
five-factor-mentoring-30-of-34-practices-classroom-management |
title |
Most attributes and practices of the five-factor mentoring model (30 of 34) provided input into a first-practicum mentee's classroom management, with no overt evidence on aims, curriculum, timetabling or assessment |
description |
Most attributes and practices of the five-factor mentoring model (30 of 34) provided input into a first-practicum mentee's classroom management, with no overt evidence on aims, curriculum, timetabling or assessment |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2011 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — sempowicz-2011 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.