Claims

Five TPACK-related moderators are most salient across meta-analyses: grade level, assessment, duration, instructional modality, and mathematics subject matter

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? An inductive review of the 13 coded meta-analyses identified five salient TPACK-related moderator categories: grade level, assessment, duration, instructional modality, and mathematics subject matter. → Young 2016

Evidence

Young 2016

Young, J.R. (2016). Unpacking TPACK in Mathematics education research: A systematic review of meta-analyses. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 2(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.2.1.19

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

The review coded study features in four categories (sample, measurement, design, source) with inter-rater agreement of 94.4% (Cohen's κ = .927), then inductively identified the five moderator categories "through repetition and statistical significance." The moderators were mapped onto TPK, TCK, and the overall TPACK construct.

"These five categories of TPACK related moderators were: (1) grade level, (2) asses sment, (3) duration, (4) instructional modality, and (5) mathematics subject matter."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.