Claims

Students most frequently reported active participation, student-teacher interaction, flexibility, repetitive watching, and peer interaction as advantages of the flipped classroom

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In questionnaire responses, the most reported advantages were active participation, student-teacher interaction, time-and-space flexibility, repetitive watching, and peer interaction. → İlknur Özpinar 2016

Evidence

İlknur Özpinar 2016

İlknur Özpinar, Arzu Aydoğan Yenmez, Semirhan Gökçe. (2016). Application of Flipped Classroom Model in the Instructional Technologies and Material Development Course. Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol. 4, No. 12. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i12.1934

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Content analysis of open-ended questionnaire responses from the experimental group; Table 10 prints frequencies such as 19 students (76%) for active participation and student-teacher interaction, and 18 (72%) for flexibility and repetitive watching.

"According to Table 10, the most reported advantages of the flipped classroom method were "ensuring the active participation in the process", "enhancing the student-teacher interaction", "being a flexible method in terms of time and space", "allowing watching repetitively" and "enhancing the peer interaction"."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.