Claims

Flipped classroom instruction produced significantly higher calculus achievement than traditional instruction in a quasi-experiment at University of Tabuk

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Preparatory-year students taught Math2 via flipped classroom with Moodle-recorded videos scored significantly higher on a calculus achievement test than students taught traditionally, after ANCOVA adjustment. → Albalawi 2018

Evidence

Albalawi 2018

Albalawi, A.S. (2018). The effect of using flipped classroom in teaching calculus on students‟ achievement at University of Tabuk. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 4(1), 198-207. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.383137

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experiment with a control group (taught traditionally, no video access) and a treatment group (flipped instruction via Moodle videos), 92 students total, tested with one-way ANCOVA. The treatment mean (19.87) exceeded the control mean (14.96), and the article reports "The effect size was 0.522" for the group factor.

"However, there were significant differences among students‟ means in favor of the treatmen t group which was taught by using flipped classroom. The effect size was 0.522, meaning that the effect of the independent variable (teaching with a flipped classroom) has an effect of 52% in student performance"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.