Claims

Flipped classrooms produce a small significant improvement in student learning over traditional classrooms in health professions education (SMD = 0.33)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q4 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i1 Across 28 comparative studies, learning outcomes favored flipped classrooms over traditional classrooms with a pooled standardized mean difference of 0.33 (95% CI 0.21–0.46, p < 0.001). → HEW Khe Foon; LO Chung Kwan 2018

Evidence

HEW Khe Foon; LO Chung Kwan 2018

HEW Khe Foon; LO Chung Kwan. (2018). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z

q4 · i1 · quant-synthesis · r3

Random-effects meta-analysis of 28 between-subject comparative studies in health professions education, pooling standardized mean differences from exam and post-test data. The pooled effect favored flipped classrooms: "SMD = 0.33, 95% CI 0.21–0.46, p < 0.001".

"A meta-analysis of 28 eligible comparative studies involving 2295 subjects exposed to flipped classroom and 2420 subjects exposed to traditional classroom showed an overall significant effect in favor of the flipped classroom approach for health professions education (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI 0.21–0.46, p < 0.001)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.