Claims

Students in flipped courses report modestly but consistently higher satisfaction than traditional-course students, with significantly higher perceived instructor availability.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Flipped courses scored higher on all six satisfaction items, with a statistically significant difference for instructor availability (Z = 2.240). → Gross 2015

Evidence

Gross 2015

Gross, B., Hoffman, M., Marinari, M., DeSimone, K., & Burke, P. (2015). Flipped @ SBU: Student satisfaction and the college classroom. Educational Research Quarterly, 39(2), 37-52. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1166718

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Survey comparison using six items from the University Student Satisfaction and Time Management Questionnaire (Cronbach's alpha = .886). The authors found "modest but consistent evidence that flipped courses were superior" across all six items.

"Here, we again found modest but consistent evidence that flipped courses were superior, scoring slightly higher than traditional lecture-based classes on all six items, with a significantly higher score found for the belief that the course instructor was more available in a flipped class."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.