Claims

Pre-service teachers in the flipped-learning group reported high satisfaction with the flipped learning activity's usefulness for video-production skills

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 100% of experimental-group respondents agreed videos and lessons were available on the e-learning portal before the activity, and over 90% agreed on four further items. → Almutairi et al. 2020

Evidence

Almutairi et al. 2020

Faisal M. Almutairi, Abdullah A. Almodaires & Alaa J. Zeyab. (2020). Effectiveness of Flipped Learning: Improving Pre-Service Teachers' Prowess in Producing Videos. International Education Studies, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n7p163

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive analysis of a revalidated five-point Likert questionnaire (Cronbach's alpha 0.912) administered to the 37 experimental-group pre-service teachers; agreement ranged from 68% to 100% across ten items. Only descriptive statistics were reported, no inferential test or effect size.

"100% of the pre-service teachers 'agreeing' that the videos and lessons were available on the e-learning portal before the Flipped Learning activity (Q1); and over 90% of the participants 'agreeing' with four items (Q2, Q3, Q5, Q9) in the feedback questionnaire"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.