Flipped learning produced no statistically significant difference in post-test video-production skill and knowledge scores compared with traditional lectures¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1–r2·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Post-test scores of pre-service teachers taught with flipped learning did not differ significantly from those taught by traditional lectures (U=675.5, p=.407). → Almutairi et al. 2020
q2 i? Pre-test scores also showed no statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groups (U=620.5, p=.168). → Almutairi et al. 2020 (2)
Evidence¶
Almutairi et al. 2020¶
Faisal M. Almutairi, Abdullah A. Almodaires & Alaa J. Zeyab. (2020). Effectiveness of Flipped Learning: Improving Pre-Service Teachers' Prowess in Producing Videos. International Education Studies, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n7p163
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Quasi-experimental study of 78 pre-service teachers (37 EG; 41 CG) in a six-week video-production workshop; Mann Whitney U test compared post-test scores between the flipped-learning group and the lecture-based control group, finding "no statistical difference (U=675.5; p=.407>.05)". No effect size was printed.
"the results of the Mann Whitney U test applied to the post-test scores of the pre-service teachers in the experimental and control groups did not show any statistical difference (U=675.5; p=.407>.05)"
Almutairi et al. 2020 (2)¶
Faisal M. Almutairi, Abdullah A. Almodaires & Alaa J. Zeyab. (2020). Effectiveness of Flipped Learning: Improving Pre-Service Teachers' Prowess in Producing Videos. International Education Studies, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n7p163
q2 · i? · causal · r1
The same quasi-experiment's pre-test comparison using the Mann Whitney U test found "no statistical difference (U=620.5; p=.168>.05)"; the authors note the rank averages (43.23 vs 36.13) were not close, suggesting unequal starting levels, yet the null hypothesis was not rejected. No effect size was printed.
"the results of Mann Whitney U test for the pre-test scores of the pre-service teachers in the experimental and control groups did not show any statistical difference (U=620.5; p=.168>.05)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The flipped classroom model did not significantly affect pre-service teachers' academic achievement compared with traditional blended learning over four weeks — related
- Pre-service teachers taught with flipped learning scored significantly higher than lecture-taught peers on the first, second and final exams, but not on final grade — reports the opposite
- Both the flipped-learning group and the lecture-based control group showed statistically significant within-group gains from pre-test to post-test — related
- Pre-service teachers in the flipped-learning group reported high satisfaction with the flipped learning activity's usefulness for video-production skills — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.