Claims

Across 28 datasets, the pooled effect of flipped learning on success is positive and statistically significant, with 20 of 28 individual datasets significant

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In all 28 datasets the relationship between flipped learning and success is positive, and in 20 of these it is statistically significant (p<0.05). → Aydin 2021 q3 i? The pooled effect size is 0.895 under the random effects model as printed in the findings text. → Aydin 2021

Evidence

Aydin 2021

Aydin, M., Okmen, B., Sahin, S., & Kilic, A. (2021). The Meta-Analysis of the Studies About the Effects of Flipped Learning on Students' Achievement. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 22(1), Article 3. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1283687

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Findings from the random effects model analysis of 28 datasets from 25 studies; the text reports the relationship between success and flipped learning is positive in all 28 datasets and statistically significant in 20 of them (p<0.05).

"According to the fixed effects model, the value of effect sizes between the flipped learning model and success is 1.068, while it is 0.895 according to the random effects model. Both effect sizes are positive, at high levels, and statistically significant (p<0.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.