Claims

Flipped learning has a medium positive effect on students' academic achievement in Turkish experimental studies after publication-bias correction (Hedges's g = 0.713)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? After publication-bias correction, the effect of the flipped learning model on students' success is medium (Hedges's g = 0.713). → Aydin 2021

Evidence

Aydin 2021

Aydin, M., Okmen, B., Sahin, S., & Kilic, A. (2021). The Meta-Analysis of the Studies About the Effects of Flipped Learning on Students' Achievement. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 22(1), Article 3. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1283687

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of 25 Turkish studies (28 datasets) using CMA software and a random effects model; the final effect size of g = 0.713 was obtained after Duval and Tweedie's trim and fill correction, which the authors describe as "the medium level effect size".

"After analysis was conducted based on the random effects model, it was determined that the effect of the flipped learning model on students' success is medium (Hedge's g=0.713) as a result of additional analysis being conducted based on publication bias."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.