Flipped classroom advantage is larger in US studies than in non-US (Asian) studies¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i3 The advantage of flipped classroom was observed in both US (SMD = 1.63) and Non-US (SMD = 0.74) studies, with the US effect larger. → Cui He 2023

Evidence¶

Cui He 2023¶

Cui He, Xie Xinyu, Wang Boyang, Zhao Yuan. (2023). Effectiveness of flipped classroom in pharmacy education – a meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04865-2

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r3

Subgroup meta-analysis by country (Table 3). Printed effect sizes: US SMD = 1.63 (1.53,1.72) across 22 comparing groups; Non-US SMD = 0.74 (0.58,0.91) across 6 comparing groups, all from Asian countries. Both subgroups showed high heterogeneity.

"The subgroup analysis by country of origin showed that the advantage of flipped classroom was observed in both US and Non-US countries. Non-US studies were all from Asia, involving China, Qatar, Thailand, and Malaysia."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Flipped classroom significantly improves pharmacy students' performance compared with traditional lecture-based approaches — related
• Flipped classroom instruction is associated with higher final knowledge scores than traditional instruction in medical education (SMD 0.90). — a broader claim this one bears on