Claims

Flipped classroom significantly improves pharmacy students' performance compared with traditional lecture-based approaches

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Across 22 studies with 28 comparing groups and 4379 participants, flipped classroom significantly promoted pharmacy students' performance versus lecture-based learning (SMD = 1.30, 95%CI 0.84–1.76, P < 0.001). → Cui He 2023

Evidence

Cui He 2023

Cui He, Xie Xinyu, Wang Boyang, Zhao Yuan. (2023). Effectiveness of flipped classroom in pharmacy education – a meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04865-2

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis pooling SMDs with a random-effects model from 22 studies (28 comparing groups, 4379 participants) comparing flipped classroom with traditional approaches in pharmacy education. The printed pooled effect size was SMD = 1.30 (95%CI 0.84–1.76, P < 0.001), with very high heterogeneity (I2 = 98.3%).

"The random effect model was applied because of significant heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 98.3%). According to meta-analysis results (see Fig. 2), flipped classroom significantly promoted the pharmacy students’ performance compared with the lecture-based learning approach (SMD 1.30, 95%CI 0.84–1.76, P < 0.001)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.