Claims

Flipped classroom advantages appear across outcome measures, with the largest for exam scores and smaller for course grades

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Subgroup analysis showed significant improvements for flipped classroom in exam scores (SMD = 1.82), course grades (SMD = 0.25), and OSCE (SMD = 0.98), all with high heterogeneity. → Cui He 2023

Evidence

Cui He 2023

Cui He, Xie Xinyu, Wang Boyang, Zhao Yuan. (2023). Effectiveness of flipped classroom in pharmacy education – a meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04865-2

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r3

Subgroup meta-analysis by outcome measure (Table 3). Printed effect sizes: exam scores SMD = 1.82 (1.71,1.93), course grade SMD = 0.25 (0.13,0.38), OSCE SMD = 0.98 (0.77,1.20), each with I2 above 96%. The article reports "significant improvements for flipped classroom in exam scores, course grades, and Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OCSE) separately."

"For outcome measures, it showed significant improvements for flipped classroom in exam scores, course grades, and Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OCSE) separately."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.