Flipped courses show no reduction in academic performance compared with lecture-based courses.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Grade point averages were roughly equal across all six courses, and perceived learning was equivalent (8.80 flipped vs. 8.77 traditional). → Gross 2015
Evidence¶
Gross 2015¶
Gross, B., Hoffman, M., Marinari, M., DeSimone, K., & Burke, P. (2015). Flipped @ SBU: Student satisfaction and the college classroom. Educational Research Quarterly, 39(2), 37-52. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1166718
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Objective grades and a subjective perceived-learning item were compared across the three flipped and three traditional courses. The authors found "a roughly equal grade point average" with no statistically significant difference between formats.
"What we found is that all six courses had a roughly equal grade point average, showing no statistical significance for the clear superiority of either format."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Flipped classroom advantages appear across outcome measures, with the largest for exam scores and smaller for course grades — reports the opposite
- Flipped classroom significantly improves theoretical exam scores over lecture-based learning in Chinese undergraduate preventive medicine courses (pooled SMD 0.99) — reports the opposite
- Flipped classrooms are associated with higher theoretical knowledge scores than lecture-based teaching in medical education (pooled SMD = 1.26), with very high heterogeneity — reports the opposite
- Cohorts taught with the flipped classroom earned significantly higher average grades than earlier cohorts taught traditionally, in a non-equivalent-groups comparison — reports the opposite
- Flipped classroom has a moderately positive effect on college students' academic performance (SMD = 0.66) — reports the opposite
- Students in flipped college algebra sections scored significantly higher on the final exam than students in lecture-based control sections (p = .0143) — reports the opposite
- Flipped classrooms are associated with improved case analysis/problem-solving ability in medical education (pooled SMD = 1.50), though statistical significance was not retained in all leave-one-out analyses — related
- Flipped classrooms are associated with improved procedural/technical skills in medical education (pooled SMD = 1.80), with larger effects among residents and in theoretical-course settings — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.