Claims

Flipped courses show no reduction in academic performance compared with lecture-based courses.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Grade point averages were roughly equal across all six courses, and perceived learning was equivalent (8.80 flipped vs. 8.77 traditional). → Gross 2015

Evidence

Gross 2015

Gross, B., Hoffman, M., Marinari, M., DeSimone, K., & Burke, P. (2015). Flipped @ SBU: Student satisfaction and the college classroom. Educational Research Quarterly, 39(2), 37-52. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1166718

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Objective grades and a subjective perceived-learning item were compared across the three flipped and three traditional courses. The authors found "a roughly equal grade point average" with no statistically significant difference between formats.

"What we found is that all six courses had a roughly equal grade point average, showing no statistical significance for the clear superiority of either format."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.