Claims

Students in flipped sections scored significantly higher on total assessments than students in unflipped lecture-based sections

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students in the flipped experimental sections scored significantly higher on total assessment grades than students in the unflipped control sections. → Motameni 2018

Evidence

Motameni 2018

Motameni, R. (2018). The Combined Impact of the Flipped Classroom, Collaborative Learning, on Students' Learning of key Marketing Concepts. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 15(3). https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol15/iss3/4

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental Static Group Comparison over four semesters: two flipped sections (76 students) versus three lecture-based control sections (91 students) in Principles of Marketing. The article reports "Students in the flipped sections scored significantly higher than those in the unflipped classes".

"Students in the flipped sections scored significantly higher than those in the unflipped classes. Therefore, for the majority of students, their participation in flipped classrooms triggered better performance in exams."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.