Claims

Students in flipped college algebra sections scored significantly higher on the final exam than students in lecture-based control sections (p = .0143)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Final exam scores in all flipped sections (mean 77.2, N=58) were significantly higher than in all control sections (mean 70.5, N=54), one-tailed t-test p = .0143. → Jenna Van Sickle 2016

Evidence

Jenna Van Sickle 2016

Jenna Van Sickle. (2016). Discrepancies between Student Perception and Achievement of Learning Outcomes in a Flipped Classroom. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 16, No. 2, April 2016, pp. 29-38. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i2.19216

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental comparison of final exam scores across four flipped college algebra sections (N=58) and six lecture-based control sections (N=54) at a small Catholic university; Table 3 reports means of 77.2 versus 70.5. The article reports a statistically significant difference with "p = .0143" and no effect size.

"Using a one-tailed t-test to determine the statistical significance in all flipped and all control scores, the flipped classes’ scores are significantly higher than those of the traditional classes, with p = .0143."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.