Claims

Out-of-class motivation showed a smaller group difference but greater within-class spread in the flipped class, attributed to client versus translator roles

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Motivation to learn out of class differed less between classes (3.73 vs 3.33) but varied more within the experimental class (SD 0.97 vs 0.46). → Deng 2018

Evidence

Deng 2018

Lijun Deng. (2018). The Project-Based Flipped Learning Model in Business English Translation Course: Learning, Teaching and Assessment. English Language Teaching, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n9p118

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Questionnaire motivation domain from the post-experiment survey; the article reports means of 3.73 (experimental) and 3.33 (control) and interprets the within-class spread as role-related. Descriptive statistics only.

"the higher standard deviation of 0.97 of the experimental class, as compared to 0.46 of the control class, might suggest that the sharpened difference of motivation within the experimental class is caused by the different roles of different student groups."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.