Claims

Speaking fluency and use of multiword expressions are positively correlated, though the relationship was significant only at pretest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Speech rate and use of multiword expressions were positively and significantly correlated at pretest across all 23 dialogues (r = .484). → Thomson 2017 q3 i? The posttest correlation and the correlation between gains in fluency and gains in multiword expression use fell short of significance. → Thomson 2017 (2)

Evidence

Thomson 2017

Haidee Thomson. (2017). Building Speaking Fluency with Multiword Expressions. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v34i3.1272

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Correlational analysis across all 23 recorded dialogues regardless of group. The pretest correlation was significant at "r = .484 (p = .019)"; the posttest correlation was not significant.

"speech rate and use of multiword expressions were positively correlated in the pretest at r = .484 (p = .019), and in the posttest at r = .237 (but the latter correlation fell short of significance: p = .275)"

Thomson 2017 (2)

Haidee Thomson. (2017). Building Speaking Fluency with Multiword Expressions. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v34i3.1272

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Correlation between pre-to-post gains in speech rate and gains in multiword expression use across the 23 dialogues. The correlation was positive but "fell short of significance, r = .31; p = .149".

"when the increase in fluency (speech rate) was related to the increase in the use of multiword expressions (regardless of group), a positive correlation was found, though this fell short of significance, r = .31; p = .149"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.