Speaking fluency and use of multiword expressions are positively correlated, though the relationship was significant only at pretest¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Speech rate and use of multiword expressions were positively and significantly correlated at pretest across all 23 dialogues (r = .484). → Thomson 2017
q3 i? The posttest correlation and the correlation between gains in fluency and gains in multiword expression use fell short of significance. → Thomson 2017 (2)
Evidence¶
Thomson 2017¶
Haidee Thomson. (2017). Building Speaking Fluency with Multiword Expressions. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v34i3.1272
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
Correlational analysis across all 23 recorded dialogues regardless of group. The pretest correlation was significant at "r = .484 (p = .019)"; the posttest correlation was not significant.
"speech rate and use of multiword expressions were positively correlated in the pretest at r = .484 (p = .019), and in the posttest at r = .237 (but the latter correlation fell short of significance: p = .275)"
Thomson 2017 (2)¶
Haidee Thomson. (2017). Building Speaking Fluency with Multiword Expressions. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v34i3.1272
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Correlation between pre-to-post gains in speech rate and gains in multiword expression use across the 23 dialogues. The correlation was positive but "fell short of significance, r = .31; p = .149".
"when the increase in fluency (speech rate) was related to the increase in the use of multiword expressions (regardless of group), a positive correlation was found, though this fell short of significance, r = .31; p = .149"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The fluency workshop did not increase trimmed speech rate significantly more than a general English class, though the experimental group alone showed a significant pre-to-post increase — related
- The fluency workshop did not increase use of target multiword expressions in speech significantly more than a general English class — related
- A 6-week fluency workshop increases EFL learners' cued recall of target multiword expressions significantly more than a general English class — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.