Claims

The fluency workshop did not increase use of target multiword expressions in speech significantly more than a general English class

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Gain scores in target multiword expression use in recorded role-plays showed no significant difference between the experimental and control groups. → Thomson 2017

Evidence

Thomson 2017

Haidee Thomson. (2017). Building Speaking Fluency with Multiword Expressions. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v34i3.1272

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Independent t-test on gain scores of target multiword expression use in 23 dyadic role-play recordings, scored by sequential-word matching with partial credit. The test showed "no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group".

"Gain scores in pre- to posttest target multiword expression use were calculated and an independent t-test showed no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group, t(21) = -.877, p = .391; d = 0.41"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.