Claims

Students' real-time focus improves cumulatively across Focus Coach sessions over time

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In Study 1, real-time focus improved across sessions, with each additional session increasing reported focus by an average of .04 points on the 1–5 scale. → Michael D. Mrazek 2026 q2 i? In Study 2, real-time focus increased as students completed more sessions over time. → Michael D. Mrazek 2026 (2)

Evidence

Michael D. Mrazek 2026

Michael D. Mrazek, Dustyn S. Ransom, Amy R. Texter, Calvin V. Tower, Bryce A. Rutila, Thomas F. Kennedy, Elijah J. Woodson, Jonathan W. Schooler, Alissa J. Mrazek. (2026). Theory-driven design and validation of a tool to enhance academic focus. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10730-y

q2 · i? · design · r3

Study 1 hierarchical linear modeling of check-in data across the six-week intervention found that “their focus improved across sessions” with b = 0.04, p < .001, when stabilizing for teacher, student, and session random effects.

"Furthermore, their focus improved across sessions, with greater real-time focus as they completed more sessions over time, b = 0.04, SE = 0.004, t (1702) = 9.62, p < .001 (Fig. 2)."

Michael D. Mrazek 2026 (2)

Michael D. Mrazek, Dustyn S. Ransom, Amy R. Texter, Calvin V. Tower, Bryce A. Rutila, Thomas F. Kennedy, Elijah J. Woodson, Jonathan W. Schooler, Alissa J. Mrazek. (2026). Theory-driven design and validation of a tool to enhance academic focus. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10730-y

q2 · i? · design · r3

Study 2 replicated the across-session effect with b = 0.03, p < .001. Sensitivity analyses in both studies found the effect remained significant down to the first two sessions, suggesting focus “continued to improve with ongoing use of the tool.”

"Furthermore, students’ real-time focus increased as they completed more sessions over time, b = 0.03, SE = 0.005, t (3045) = 6.16, p < .001 (Fig. 2)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id focus-coach-across-session-focus-gain
title Students' real-time focus improves cumulatively across Focus Coach sessions over time
description Students' real-time focus improves cumulatively across Focus Coach sessions over time
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — michael-d-mrazek-2026, michael-d-mrazek-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.