Focus during independent work improves, with the largest gains among students who complete the most sessions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · designr3·q2·i1small
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i1 In Study 2, focus during independent work significantly increased from pre- to post-test among the pre-registered room-to-grow subset, and the increase was larger for students who completed more sessions. → Michael D. Mrazek 2026
q2 i? Exploratory analysis found the independent-work-focus increase was also significant across the entire sample, with greater improvements associated with more completed sessions. → Michael D. Mrazek 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Michael D. Mrazek 2026¶
Michael D. Mrazek, Dustyn S. Ransom, Amy R. Texter, Calvin V. Tower, Bryce A. Rutila, Thomas F. Kennedy, Elijah J. Woodson, Jonathan W. Schooler, Alissa J. Mrazek. (2026). Theory-driven design and validation of a tool to enhance academic focus. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10730-y
q2 · i1 · design · r3
Study 2 used a refined two-item percentage-based measure of independent work focus. In the pre-registered room-to-grow subset, focus increased (Table 2: SMD = 0.28), and the increase was larger for students who completed more sessions, b = 0.61, p = .028.
"Among this a priori and pre-registered subset, focus during independent work significantly increased from pre- to post-test (Table 2). This increase was larger for students who completed more sessions, b = 0.61, SE = 0.28, t (378.0) = 2.20, p = .028."
Michael D. Mrazek 2026 (2)¶
Michael D. Mrazek, Dustyn S. Ransom, Amy R. Texter, Calvin V. Tower, Bryce A. Rutila, Thomas F. Kennedy, Elijah J. Woodson, Jonathan W. Schooler, Alissa J. Mrazek. (2026). Theory-driven design and validation of a tool to enhance academic focus. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10730-y
q2 · i? · design · r3
An exploratory whole-sample analysis in Study 2 found the independent-work-focus increase significant (Table 2: SMD = 0.10), with greater improvements associated with more completed sessions, b = 0.57, p = .024. The dose association is correlational.
"An exploratory analysis determined that the increase in independent work focus was also significant across the entire sample (Table 2), with greater improvements in independent work focus associated with a higher number of completed sessions, b = 0.57, SE = 0.25, t (177.9) = 2.28, p = .024."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students' real-time focus improves cumulatively across Focus Coach sessions over time — related
- Classroom focus improves from pre-test to post-test among students who initially focus less than they ideally should — related
- Study 1 found no significant change in independent work focus with the single-item measure — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
focus-coach-independent-work-focus-gain-dose |
title |
Focus during independent work improves, with the largest gains among students who complete the most sessions |
description |
Focus during independent work improves, with the largest gains among students who complete the most sessions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — michael-d-mrazek-2026, michael-d-mrazek-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.