Claims

Focus during independent work improves, with the largest gains among students who complete the most sessions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r3 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i1 In Study 2, focus during independent work significantly increased from pre- to post-test among the pre-registered room-to-grow subset, and the increase was larger for students who completed more sessions. → Michael D. Mrazek 2026 q2 i? Exploratory analysis found the independent-work-focus increase was also significant across the entire sample, with greater improvements associated with more completed sessions. → Michael D. Mrazek 2026 (2)

Evidence

Michael D. Mrazek 2026

Michael D. Mrazek, Dustyn S. Ransom, Amy R. Texter, Calvin V. Tower, Bryce A. Rutila, Thomas F. Kennedy, Elijah J. Woodson, Jonathan W. Schooler, Alissa J. Mrazek. (2026). Theory-driven design and validation of a tool to enhance academic focus. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10730-y

q2 · i1 · design · r3

Study 2 used a refined two-item percentage-based measure of independent work focus. In the pre-registered room-to-grow subset, focus increased (Table 2: SMD = 0.28), and the increase was larger for students who completed more sessions, b = 0.61, p = .028.

"Among this a priori and pre-registered subset, focus during independent work significantly increased from pre- to post-test (Table 2). This increase was larger for students who completed more sessions, b = 0.61, SE = 0.28, t (378.0) = 2.20, p = .028."

Michael D. Mrazek 2026 (2)

Michael D. Mrazek, Dustyn S. Ransom, Amy R. Texter, Calvin V. Tower, Bryce A. Rutila, Thomas F. Kennedy, Elijah J. Woodson, Jonathan W. Schooler, Alissa J. Mrazek. (2026). Theory-driven design and validation of a tool to enhance academic focus. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10730-y

q2 · i? · design · r3

An exploratory whole-sample analysis in Study 2 found the independent-work-focus increase significant (Table 2: SMD = 0.10), with greater improvements associated with more completed sessions, b = 0.57, p = .024. The dose association is correlational.

"An exploratory analysis determined that the increase in independent work focus was also significant across the entire sample (Table 2), with greater improvements in independent work focus associated with a higher number of completed sessions, b = 0.57, SE = 0.25, t (177.9) = 2.28, p = .024."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id focus-coach-independent-work-focus-gain-dose
title Focus during independent work improves, with the largest gains among students who complete the most sessions
description Focus during independent work improves, with the largest gains among students who complete the most sessions
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — michael-d-mrazek-2026, michael-d-mrazek-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.