Claims

Study 1 found no significant change in independent work focus with the single-item measure

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In Study 1, there was no significant change in the single-item independent work focus measure from pre-test to post-test. → Michael D. Mrazek 2026

Evidence

Michael D. Mrazek 2026

Michael D. Mrazek, Dustyn S. Ransom, Amy R. Texter, Calvin V. Tower, Bryce A. Rutila, Thomas F. Kennedy, Elijah J. Woodson, Jonathan W. Schooler, Alissa J. Mrazek. (2026). Theory-driven design and validation of a tool to enhance academic focus. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10730-y

q2 · i? · design · r3

Study 1 pre-post analysis of the single-item 1–6 independent work focus measure found no significant change (Table 1: b = −0.03, p = .68). Equivalence was not tested; the null reflects non-detection.

"There was no significant change in independent work focus (Table 1)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id focus-coach-null-independent-work-single-item
title Study 1 found no significant change in independent work focus with the single-item measure
description Study 1 found no significant change in independent work focus with the single-item measure
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — michael-d-mrazek-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.