Claims

Larger font sizes produce modestly better memory than smaller font sizes, with a small but significant pooled effect

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Font size has a small but statistically significant effect on memory accuracy. → Chang 2022

Evidence

Chang 2022

Chang, M., Brainerd, C.J. (2022). Association and dissociation between judgments of learning and memory: A Meta-analysis of the font size effect. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09287-3

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

Meta-analysis of studies contributing memory-performance data on the font size effect. The synthesis reports "a small but significant effect of font size on memory"; no effect-size value or test statistic is printed in the available text.

"There was also a small but significant effect of font size on memory."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id font-size-improves-memory-meta-analytic
title Larger font sizes produce modestly better memory than smaller font sizes, with a small but significant pooled effect
description Larger font sizes produce modestly better memory than smaller font sizes, with a small but significant pooled effect
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — chang-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.