Claims

Larger font sizes produce higher judgments of learning than smaller font sizes, with a small-to-moderate pooled effect

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across studies, font size has a small-to-moderate effect on judgments of learning. → Chang 2022

Evidence

Chang 2022

Chang, M., Brainerd, C.J. (2022). Association and dissociation between judgments of learning and memory: A Meta-analysis of the font size effect. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09287-3

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

Meta-analysis of studies providing JOL data for the font size effect, using univariate and multivariate meta-regressions to isolate moderators. The pooled result was "a small-to-moderate effect of font size on JOLs"; no standardized effect size value is printed in the available text.

"The results revealed a small-to-moderate effect of font size on JOLs."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id font-size-increases-jols-meta-analytic
title Larger font sizes produce higher judgments of learning than smaller font sizes, with a small-to-moderate pooled effect
description Larger font sizes produce higher judgments of learning than smaller font sizes, with a small-to-moderate pooled effect
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — chang-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.